og culling, which is the mass killing of dogs, is a controversial method of population control for stray dogs. Some argue that culling is necessary to protect public health and safety, while others argue that it is inhumane and ineffective in the long term.

There is evidence to suggest that culling can actually exacerbate the problem of stray dog populations by creating a vacuum effect, where new dogs move in to occupy the space left by the culled dogs. In addition, culling can be expensive and difficult to implement, and may be met with opposition from animal welfare organizations and the general public.

Many experts recommend alternative methods of population control, such as sterilization and vaccination programs, as a more effective and humane solution to managing stray dog populations. These programs can help to reduce the number of new puppies being born, which can ultimately reduce the overall population of stray dogs over time.

Ultimately, the decision on whether to implement culling or alternative methods of population control for stray dogs should be based on a careful consideration of all available options, taking into account the best available scientific evidence, ethical considerations, and the interests of public health and animal welfare.

Hence, the only humane solution is to get all the dogs treated because dog culling has never played a positive role in the society as it has only created hatred to the people and authority involved in this heinous act.

Read: Dog culling on the rise again

Follow us on our Facebook Group